Sunday, November 29, 2009
Remember When
Friday, November 27, 2009
Weekly Picks
Bob's Picks for Nov. 27-28, 2009: Point Spreads always are based on Danny Sheridan's Wednesday spreads in USA TODAY.
Bob's picks last week Against-the-Spread (ATS): 1-3, Season: 21-28
All 2009 Games
Last Week ATS:
Favorites covered 26 (50.98%), failed to cover 25, 1 Push
Season ATS:
Favorites covered 260 (48.78%), failed to cover 273
More to Play For
By this time of the season, it is time that the better teams assert themselves. Frankly, some teams have more to play for than others. That is the theme of my five picks this week.
Take all that as you will, dear reader. Your humble prognosticator has suffered only one losing season in 14 years of picking college football. That was the dreaded 1999 season when I stumbled past New Years Day with a 46.7 percent mark. Don't look now, but I currently am drowning at 42.9 percent, and unless I hit about 15 of 18 in the closing weeks and bowl games, I'm sunk.
For what its worth, the yesteryear high-water marks for picking games occurred in 1994 at 69.7 percent and 2007 at 72.1 percent.
Here are my picks for Friday and Saturday, November 27-28:
Friday
Pittsburgh (Even) at WEST VIRGINIA
Dave Wannstedt scares me because under his coaching regime, Pitt has had a nasty tendency to collapse at some bad times. On the other hand, West Virginia's Bill Stewart is never going to be confused with Vince Lombardi. Pitt can reach a BCS bowl with a win here in the "Backyard Brawl" and an upset of Cincinnati next week. Pick: Pittsburgh Even
Saturday
North Carolina (-5.5) at NORTH CAROLINA STATE
Another hot team with much to play for is North Carolina, winners of four straight. NC State has some good weapons, but the Tar Heels boast a tremendous defense that will give headaches to its bowl opponent. Pick: North Carolina -5.5
Oklahoma State (+9.5) at OKLAHOMA
One of these days we co-authors of The USA TODAY College Football Encyclopedia are going to have to research the record of visiting teams in rivalry games. I am so certain that visitors in run-of-the-mill conference games generally lose, but that in rivalry match-ups, home and away situations have far less impact. Note, dear reader, that each of my rivalry-game picks so far are visiting teams, considerably unfazed I believe by playing in their rival's stadium. Here comes another: Oklahoma State still holds out hope for a BCS bowl. While injury-riddled Oklahoma surely is the nation's best team saddled with five losses, the Sooners have so little to play for and are such a big favorite here. Pick: Oklahoma State +9.5
Miami (-5.5) at SOUTH FLORIDA
To the detriment of my won-loss record, I've probably overrated Miami all season. But I can't see the Hurricanes losing to another fast-fading South Florida team. The Bulls are 2-3 since winning their first five this season. They have closed the last two regular seasons at 1-4 and 3-3. Miami delivers more of the same. Pick: Miami -5.5
Notre Dame (+10) at STANFORD
It is so hard to see the Irish getting off the canvas to fight for a coach who is doomed, unless the contractual buyout proves too daunting and earns another chance for that coach. Charlie Weis has very infrequently gotten his Notre Dame "up" for any game. How can he do it more than 2,000 miles from home against a hungry Stanford Cardinal wanting to get back on the winning track? Pick: Stanford -10
Paul's Picks for Nov. 27-28, 2009: Point Spreads always are based on Danny Sheridan's Wednesday spreads in USA TODAY.
Paul's picks last week Against-the-Spread (ATS): 3-1, Season: 25-19
Down the stretch we come
It is the time of the year when bellies are stuffed, winds are blowing a bit too strong, and football players earn bragging rights in their rivalry games. Texas A&M gave hated Texas a serious scare last night in a game that looked a lot like the high-scoring Big 12 from 2008. UCLA sees plenty of vulnerability in USC, West Virginia looks to enjoy their new position as underdog in the "Backyard Brawl" and Auburn would love nothing better than to post loss number one on Alabama's ledger. These games are compelling beyond the won-loss records of the individual teams and are a challenge for the prognosticator.
Here are my picks for Friday and Saturday, November 27-28:
Friday
Temple (-2.5) at AKRON
The Owls are enjoying a breakout year under coach Al Golden, who now will be rumored for a number of openings at bigger programs. They have sliced through their MAC schedule this year with ease, but need to play at a high level to continue what is now a nine-game win streak. If Temple does not look ahead to the MAC championship game next week against Central Michigan, they should win this game by 10. Pick: Temple -2.5
Alabama (-10) at AUBURN
This is a last-second pick for me as I wanted to hit on one of the bigger games of the weekend. Inspired by the performance of the Aggies last night I am going with Auburn today as I have felt all season that the big three of Florida, Alabama and Texas have not been as separated from their competition this season as the standings and polls may suggest. All of the upperclassmen for the Tigers have both memories of the 36-0 whipping the Tide gave them last year and confidence from the six-game Iron Bowl win steak they enjoyed through 2007. This game should be fun. Pick: Auburn +10
Saturday
Utah (+7.5) at BRIGHAM YOUNG
The 85th edition of "The Holy War" will feature a bunch of kids who care more about becoming the de facto champion of the Beehive State than religion. With both squads playing second fiddle to TCU in the conference this year, this game also has Mountain West Conference positioning riding on it. BYU has not won this game by more than 7 points since 1996 and they do not do so here. Pick: Utah +7.5
Washington State (+24.5) at WASHINGTON
In terms of national prestige, the Apple Cup has fallen on hard times. Washington State has actually had the better of their cross-state rivals for most of the past few years and while I like the Huskies to win outright, the game means too much to the Cougar players for them to get blown out. Plus, this spread is based on what the Huskies did in the first half of the season. Pick: Washington State +24.5
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Pac 10 Groupie
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Undying Love for the MAC
Monday, November 23, 2009
Weighing in on Weis
In many ways Weis deserves what is coming to him. He is arrogant when winning, to the point of not making friends among administrators, alumni and press who could help him now. He is a poor game manager, as evidenced by stretches of every game where his team tanks and he is unable to make adjustments. He is a poor judge of assistant coaching talent. He is unable to develop anyone on the defensive side of the ball. His team's almost always lose the intensity battle to the opposition, which is why they have performed so poorly against seemingly over matched teams like Navy. He plays favorites. He...
That's enough. I am kicking a man while he's down. Weis did do some things right, namely recruit well, graduate players and produce a good, if inconsistent offense. And he kept the tradition of the place front and center. But, he did not win enough games. It usually boils down to that factor.
The bigger concern for Notre Dame fans is the question of his replacement. Notre Dame has done a pretty poor job of hiring football coaches since tabbing Ara Parseghian 46 years ago. Sure Dan Devine and Lou Holtz are both Hall of Famers who won titles at Notre Dame, but even their tenures ended with both sides unhappy. But hiring Gerry Faust, Bob Davie and Charlie Weis without head coaching experience? The fiasco regarding George O'Leary's resume? Hiring Ty Willingham despite his reluctance to recruit and then canning him for Urban Meyer--who took the Florida job instead? That hiring record does not inspire confidence.
The main obstacle in any search is that the candidate needs to be near perfect to succeed.
+He must have successful head coaching experience. Frank Leahy, Parseghian, Devine and Holtz all did well elsewhere before coming to South Bend and winning with the Irish.
+He must be able to handle intense pressure. Both Leahy and Parseghian left coaching as relatively young men due to the pressure to win every game.
+He must be able to recruit players from across the nation who are both talented and able to handle the classes at Notre Dame. Weis seemed to do well in this regard except his recruiting classes were lopsided in favor of the offense. Most of the other top recruiters do so at large state schools without rigid requirements.
+His players must graduate. People keep throwing out the name Chris Peterson of Boise State as a candidate, but Boise is at less than 60% graduation of the players signed in 2002 and that is despite not having kids leave early for the pros.
+He cannot embarrass the school nor allow any players to do the same. Meyer's public squabbling with USC, Tennessee and yes even Notre Dame would not be appreciated, nor his recruiting kids who have committed transgressions both on and off the field. Weis lost his backup TE before the season started because the kid went streaking and then was banished from campus by the Office of Residence Life.
+He must have the attributes of a good public speaker. Holtz was a home run in this regard while the faithful could not stand the dour Devine.
+His teams must be known for toughness. Weis failed in this regard despite coming from a Patriots organization known for its toughness.
The job is even more complicated when factoring in the Catholic angle (don't have to be one--see Rockne and Parseghian--but it helps) and the cold weather (good ol' boy Southerners could have a problem).
So who could handle the position? More importantly, who would want to? Stay tuned, but Irish fans should not be too optimistic.
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Remember When
Friday, November 20, 2009
College Football Performance Formula
November 18
1. Texas 1.8619
2. TCU 1.8016
3. Alabama 1.7940
4. Florida 1.7411
5. Boise State 1.6952
6. Cincinnati 1.6616
7. Ohio State 1.5900
8. Pittsburgh 1.5561
9. Louisiana State 1.5530
10. Oregon 1.5494
11. Georgia Tech 1.5338
12. Virginia Tech 1.5213
13. Penn State 1.5027
14. Iowa 1.4672
15. Oklahoma State 1.4594
16. Clemson 1.4197
17. Wisconsin 1.4099
18. BYU 1.3645
19. Nebraska 1.3537
20. Utah 1.3475
21. Houston 1.343889
22. Miami 1.343870
23. Rutgers 1.3365
24. Central Michigan 1.3130
25. Oregon State 1.3026
26. Stanford 1.3021
27. USC 1.3006
28. Arkansas 1.3004
29. Navy 1.2909
30. West Virginia 1.2836
31. Arizona 1.2776
32. Mississippi 1.2671
33. Temple 1.2646
34. Boston College 1.2567
35. California 1.2554
36. Nevada 1.2426
37. North Carolina 1.2342
38. Auburn 1.2317
39. Notre Dame 1.2238
40. Air Force 1.2097
The Performance Formula compiles a grade for each of college football's 120 FBS teams based on three stat categories: winning percentage, opponents' winning percentage, and scoring margin. Both winning percentage factors are adjusted down to account for wins over FCS schools, and scoring margins are diminished to avoid stat-skewing by a win or loss margin greater than 40 points. A perfectly average team will score 1.0000, while eventual national champions generally score in excess of 1.7500.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Weekly Picks
Bob's Picks for Nov. 21, 2009: Point Spreads always are based on Danny Sheridan's Wednesday spreads in USA TODAY.
Bob's picks last week Against-the-Spread (ATS): 1-5, Season: 20-25
All 2009 Games
Last Week ATS:
Favorites covered 31 (57.4%), failed to cover 23, 1 Push, 1 Even
Season ATS:
Favorites covered 234 (48.5%), failed to cover 248
Fallen to "Swami" Status
Chris "Boomer" Berman of ESPN, known as "The Swami" when picking NFL games, hasn't a serious bone in his handicapping body. A couple of weeks ago when the Buccaneers and Patriots went to London to play he picked the Patriots to win 1776 to 1588. Those would be the years of the American Revolution (Patriots) and the Defeat of the Spanish Armada (Bucs). Get it? Hey, he won the pick.
As far as we know, however, "The Swami" has never hit a break-even season in the 30 or so years Berman has played Swami.
And now, I too have fallen to a similar status after last week's 1-5 disaster. I still say the Houston Cougars as a small favorite over Central Florida and the Rice Owls as a favorite over anybody other than Western Kentucky were two of the strangest lines out of Vegas ever. Too bad I had no clue. It is games like those that prompt some wise-guys to wonder about things being on the up-and-up.
I'm a desperate picker. The reader might consider pulling a George Costanza and go completely against every natural instinct in believing my picks. But here goes.
Here are my picks for the week of November 21:
Thursday:
Colorado +16 at OKLAHOMA STATE
"Mr. Thursday" returns with his lifetime 68-16 record (80.95%). Oklahoma State, so sexy after its early season win over Georgia but almost dismissed after losing to Houston, continues on a path to a New Years Day bowl. Colorado has pretty slipped off the face of the map, and coach Dan Hawkins likely has his bags packed. I don't usually go for spreads larger than 12 points, but I really like the Cowpokes at home. Pick: Oklahoma State -16
Saturday:
Purdue (-3.5) at INDIANA
No team in America has had the bad luck the Hoosiers have suffered. They stand at 4-7 but absolutely should have beaten Michigan and Northwestern and easily might have beaten Iowa and Penn State—Indiana had good leads into the second half each time. Purdue, also 4-7, is up and down, looking good one week (see Oregon, Ohio State and Illinois) and awful the next (see Northern Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin). I feel Indiana has more to play for, has more pride, and is at home in a rivalry game. Pick: Indiana +3.5
Louisiana State (+3.5) at MISSISSIPPI
Disappointing Mississippi had their big effort last week in crushing Tennessee. The LSU Tigers at 8-2 have beaten everybody but Florida and Alabama—the polls' top two teams in the country—and have a defense faster than anything Ole Miss has pretty well seen so far. It ought to be close and entertaining, but why is LSU an underdog? I believe this is the week's biggest mismatch in Jeff Sagarin's USA TODAY ranking system. Pick: LSU +3.5
Air Force (+10) at BYU
Underrated Air Force can secure a good bowl game with a win over BYU, a team nipping at a good ranking all year. The Falcons may not win this one, and I usually like underdogs that I feel can win. More than anything, I'm going with a hunch here. Hey, logic hasn't worked out that well for me this year. Pick: Air Force +10
Paul's Picks for Nov. 21, 2009:
Paul's picks last week Against-the-Spread (ATS): 2-2, Season: 22-18
There's No Crying in Football
No, I am not directing this to New York Jets coach Rex Ryan. But once again I have read an editorial by a sportswriter, this time ESPN's Ivan Maisel, that is a grievance about the 2009 season. Maisel is bored by the match-ups this weekend—and yes it is a slow weekend—as he has by the whole season. Of course he neglects to mention that the NFL lineup for the week includes eight games with spreads larger than a TD. He complains that the biggest college game this weekend is Arizona-Oregon, but fails to notice that the biggest pro game of the weekend is Denver-San Diego (the pro equivalent of…Arizona-Oregon). He even throws the Heisman race into the picture as if a fan cannot enjoy the sport without a discussion of the race for a popularity trophy.
So, Ivan, quit your job if you do understand that any college football game could turn out to be a quality, exciting contest. The drama unfolding throughout the country on any Saturday is unpredictable and not chained to the determination of a national champion. And crying over the mediocrity of some of the bigger programs is truly sad coming from a sportswriter who should know that having USC win the Pac 10 every year is actually boring and that Notre Dame does not have any more of a claim to a top 10 ranking than TCU.
But that's enough ranting for now. Let's get on with the picks.
Here are my picks for the week of November 21:
Friday:
Akron (+11) at BOWLING GREEN
I must be 0-20 the past few year picking MAC games so go along with me here at your own peril. I am taking Bowling Green in honor of star WR Freddie Barnes, who will catch 11 passes tomorrow night, one for each pt the Falcons are favored by. Plus the Falcons are due to win big at home, having lost three straight (but to Boise State, Ohio and Central Michigan). Pick: Bowling Green -11
Saturday:
Wisconsin (-7) at NORTHWESTERN
With the focus of attention in Big 10 country on the Big Three this season of Ohio State, Iowa and Penn State, it may be surprising to some that Wisconsin is 8-2 and Northwestern stands at 7-4. Both teams are playing well of late and the Wildcats have won the past two series games played in Evanston. There should be plenty of pts scored in this game as Northwestern will struggle to stop John Clay and the powerful Badgers rush game, while Wisconsin has allowed 28, 31 and 28 pts in their three Big Ten road games. Pick: Northwestern +7
Rutgers (-8) at SYRACUSE
The Syracuse program is tired. New coach Doug Marrone worked them hard this summer in an effort to change the culture, which also chased away some players. The team was fired up for early season contests against Big Ten teams, even managing an upset of Northwestern. But by mid-season the wheels fell off as the team's best player on O, WR Mike Williams, quit amid rumors of a failed drug test, and the best D player, DT Arthur Jones, was lost for the season with a knee injury. They are 0-5 in the Big East, having lost their best chance for a win by 1 pt to Louisville last week. Rutgers, on the other hand, heads to the Carrier Dome riding a three-game win streak. They are 3-0 on the road too, with three covers. They have won four straight on the series by an average score of 36-12 and should not be looking ahead to anything as they have Louisville on the schedule for Thanksgiving weekend. Pick: Rutgers -8
Kansas (+27.5) at TEXAS
There are a lot of hurt feelings in Lawrence as the Kansas team not only continues to lose—five straight and counting—but have their sights on the head of coach Mark Mangino being presented to them on a plate. The Jayhawks are about as far removed from their amazing 2007 season as possible. While the Longhorns have actually been covering with more ease on the road this season, they should have no problem romping here. With a win, Longhorns QB Colt McCoy will become the winningest QB in NCAA history. Get your erasers ready NCAA. Pick: Texas -27.5
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
SEC Mess
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Big East Overview
Monday, November 16, 2009
ACC Overview
Sunday, November 15, 2009
View From Bennett Avenue
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Remember When
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Weekly Picks
Bob's Picks for Nov. 14, 2009: Point Spreads always are based on Danny Sheridan's Wednesday spreads in USA TODAY.
Bob's picks last week Against-the-Spread (ATS): 1-1, Season: 19-20
All 2009 Games
Last Week ATS:
Favorites covered 20 (40%), failed to cover 30, 1 Push
Season ATS:
Favorites covered 203 (47.4%), failed to cover 225
Just Horsin' Around
There are so many attractive lines this week that it seems proper to just horse around and go for six big picks. If I can win at least five of them, I'll venture past the awful break-even mark I've been lounging on all season.
Here are my picks for the week of November 14:
All Saturday games:
Tennessee (+4.5) at MISSISSIPPI
Some experts had Ole Miss in the top five at season's start, but the Rebels have spit the bit. Although they might have one big game in them, it is hard to see how Jevon Snead can suddenly become the star quarterback that finished last year, especially against an ever-improving Tennessee defense. Some prized Tennessee recruits are facing an armed robbery charge this week, but intense coach Lane Kiffin is the type not to let his squad suffer a letdown when the Vols are one win from locking up a bowl berth. Mississippi's best defender, end Greg Hardy, is out injured. Pick: Tennessee +4.5
Nebraska -4 at KANSAS
Nebraska has a remedial offense but a defense that might rank with the best in school annals. Kansas, losers of four straight Big 12 games, can't stop anybody's offense lately and also has spit the bit. Pick: Nebraska -4
Stanford +10.5 at SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
As much as we like Stanford's style of pounding big thoroughbred Toby Gerhart at every defense, he appeared to be about out of gas at the end of the big Oregon upset last week. Can he bounce back after 233 carries in nine games? I can't see how the Cardinal team can be way up again so soon. Back home and ready to right the ship defensively, USC looks to return to old form. Pick: USC -10.5
Arizona (-1) at CALIFORNIA
The Bears were slow from the starting gate against Oregon State. Then they lost their best player, Jahvid Best, to a very scary injury. Best is at home recuperating. Don't look now, but the over-achieving Arizona Wildcats can get to their season finale against USC with the Rose Bowl on the line. I'll bet they wish they could have a do-over on that freak, edge-of-shoe, game-losing touchdown interception return perpetrated by Washington. Pick: Arizona -1
Houston (-4.5) at CENTRAL FLORIDA
What?! Houston, winners over Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, and Mississippi State and sitting on an 8-1 record (Can you say, "New Years Day Bowl Game?"), are a measly favorite over Central Florida, that has only one win over a winning team, and that's scrawny Marshall at 5-4? A friend of mine would call this a "Vegas Sucker Bet." I call it insanity. Is Las Vegas simply horsing around to see if we're paying attention late in the season? Pick: Houston -4.5
Tulane (+2.5) at RICE
I'll own up to having watched more horse racing than Tulane games this year, an accidental five seconds of last week's Breeder's Cup vs. zero seconds of the Green Wave. Then my natural finger twitch snapped in on the TV remote and it was back to the Big Ten Network for Northwestern-Iowa. I always say, never pick a team (Tulane) you haven't given the eyeball test. But, there are 20 Texas high schools capable of beating 0-9 Rice, despite last year's 10-win season. I hate to admit that, because I've always liked the Owls, going way back to the days of Frank Ryan, King Hill, and Buddy Dial. Really, is Las Vegas just horsing around with Rice as a favorite…over anybody? Pick: Tulane +2.5
Paul's Picks for Nov. 14, 2009
Paul's picks last week Against-the-Spread (ATS): 2-2, Season: 20-16
International Bowl Here I Come!
Barely above .500, I am targeting enough wins to become eligible for a minor bowl game. I must remain focused despite minor injuries and other distractions.
Here are my picks for the week of November 14:
Smu (-7) at UTEP
Bob and I are all over Conference USA this week. The Mustangs have become competitive in year two under June Jones, but face a Miner team that has done a better job this season in the spoiler's role than as favorite. Pick: UTEP +7
Unlv (+17) at AIR FORCE
With the Rebels playing out the string in the fifth year under coach Mark Sanford, it is difficult to see them muster much of a challenge to an Air Force program that has won six of last seven in the series. The Falcons have been very good under coach Troy Calhoun at beating the teams they are supposed to beat. Pick: Air Force -17
Florida (-15.5) at SOUTH CAROLINA
Every time I pick South Carolina to step up in class and deliver a big win they disappoint me. The Gators meanwhile have already wrapped up their spot in the SEC championship game, yet will find motivation from their desire to continually embarrass former Florida coach Steve Spurrier while quieting naysayers. Pick: Florida -15.5
Utah (+19.5) at TCU
The Horned Frogs are playing at such a high level that it is difficult to pick against them. But being favored by nearly three TDs against their nemesis, Utah, winners of five of six in the series? The Utes will do their best to control the ball, limit mistakes and get in the heads of the TCU players. The pressure is on TCU with conference title, BCS bowl berth and any chance to get into the BCS title game riding on this game. Pick: Utah +19.5
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
View From Bennett Avenue
I just finished reading an editorial by New York Times writer Pete Thamel that lambasts college football for not instituting a playoff system. Because of a lack of a playoff system college football this season is "sputtering to the finish." The term "lackluster" is used in the headline and later in the article he negatively compares the college game to the NFL version because the NFL playoff system guarantees that "the top teams are usually left to play each other."
There is so much wrong with his analysis that I am unsure of where to begin. For one thing there is the tone, which is one of someone who does not seem to appreciate the basic joys of college football. I began a text Sunday morning to a friend, Patrick Carroll, with the line "another great day in cfb." Unlike Mr. Thamel I enjoyed a slate of games that featured a heavyweight clash between Alabama and Louisiana State, a stunning performance by Stanford in beating Oregon, wild finishes involving ranked teams such as Cincinnati, Houston, Georgia Tech and USC and upsets of Northwestern over Iowa, Navy over Notre Dame (okay, so I a lifelong ND fan did not enjoy this one too much) and Nebraska over Oklahoma. I do not know what sport he was following, but college football delivered Saturday as it does every week.
Now the three teams atop the rankings are still there and have been there all season, which is something that drives him crazy. This is where the college game gets treated unfairly by the national media, especially by those who do not understand the sport. There are some years, such as 2005, where one or two or even three schools separate themselves from the pack. In other years, like the past few, we have multiple undefeated or one-loss teams all fighting to finish in the top two of the final regular season BCS poll. Prior to the BCS, the Alabama-Florida winner and Texas would have been contracted to play in different bowl games. With that now a thing of the past, they can meet in a BCS title game reminiscent of the 2005 season when USC and Texas pulled away from the others by mid-season and then met in a memorable title game. In the NFL, we actually have the same situation as the past two seasons can illuminate. Where was the suspense two years ago when everyone was waiting to coronate the Pats from late September on? Yes the Giants upset them in the Super Bowl, but so too in 2005 did Texas (a dog of more than a touchdown) shock a Trojans squad that was being ranked with the best of all-time. What is the difference? But then last season the NFL was so wide open that a mediocre Arizona Cardinals team that lost games during the regular season by scores of 56-35, 48-20 and 47-7 reached the Super Bowl. Where is Thamel's editorial decrying the lack of excitement in the NFL this season as New England, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, Minnesota, New Orleans and Arizona all look to be locks to win their respective division crowns? You get both types of seasons in both the pro and college game.
The next item on the list is that Thamel knows today, November 10, that the rest of the season lacks "a single competitive game left on the schedule that directly relates to the national title." That is completely wrong for two major reasons. One is that the games on the field have to be played out. Is it really impossible for Texas to lose to Texas A&M, who won this hard-fought series match-up two out of the last three years, and then fall behind a Cincinnati squad in the BCS standings, if the Bearcats can stay undefeated? Or for Alabama to drop road games at Mississippi State and Auburn or Florida to lost at South Carolina or to a Florida State squad playing for its aging coaching staff? He writes that there are "no elite teams" yet is upset that these three teams are running away with the national title picture. In 2006, a 10-1 USC squad was knocked out of the BCS title game on the final day of the regular season by a 6-5 UCLA team. In 2007, the final three weeks of the regular season saw massive upsets in Arizona beating Oregon, Texas Tech beating Oklahoma, Arkansas beating LSU and Pitt beating West Virginia, all of which shook up the BCS rankings. So, upsets occur. Watch the games!
The other major reason that the statement above, which mocks the rest of the regular season, is incorrect is that it misses the point about college athletics. Professional sports are set up in such a way that there is one champion and the rest of the teams are losers. The college game cannot be set up that way, and should not be set up that way. I am looking forward to next week's Ohio State game versus Iowa, which is a de facto playoff game for a spot in the Rose Bowl. Does it have any national title implications? No. Can it be a fun and competitive game? Sure. Do these two teams want to win that game more than any other because they want to win the Big Ten and get to the Rose Bowl? Absolutely. There is nothing like that in the pro game. And then the following week, Ohio State has to travel to Ann Arbor to face a Michigan squad that knows that they can restore a great deal of lost pride by upsetting the Buckeyes. Would the Redskins, let's say, want to beat the first-place Cowboys (as a Giants fan I cannot believe I typed those words) this season. Sure. Is it anywhere close to being the same as the Michigan-OSU level of emotion? Not by a mile.
Which gets back to Thamel's main argument that by not having a playoff system the college game is eliminating suspense from the end of the regular season…umm on the off years that teams pull away from the pack. That the Iowa-OSU game would be more important if the two teams were not just playing for the conference title and BCS game berth but for a shot at a playoff where they could possibly win the whole thing. But, of course, everyone is knocking the Big Ten this season. So the Big Ten's fight for a potential playoff spot would be the equivalent of this season's AFC West battle between San Diego and Denver--that is, two decent teams who do not look to be as good as some other AFC teams. Or it would if the two teams played each other in December, which they do not. In fact, San Diego's last six games are against non AFC West opponents. How stupid is that?
While a playoff system would cheapen the regular season, the main argument against it is economics. First of all you would have to have a 16-team system as there would be no way to determine at large teams fairly in an 8-team system. With eight teams the winners of the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big Twelve, Pac Ten and SEC would eat up six spots. How would you then determine the remaining two spots when, using this season as an example, you would have too many deserving teams to choose from (Boise, TCU, the SEC title game loser, etc.)? So, let's go with a 16-team playoffs with the lesser bowls being used as sites for playoff games. But that would mean that the teams from up north would have a huge disadvantage as they would be playing on the road throughout the playoffs. But more importantly, how could they fill the seats for these games? Right now the Outback Bowl grabs teams from the Big Ten and SEC and gives their fans a month to book flights, hotel rooms and rental cars for a game played when they have off from work in a place where they would want to spend a winter vacation. Now you would be telling fans of the Iowa-Ohio State game that they would play December 12 in Orlando and if they win they will play the following weekend in Dallas and then the following weekend in Pasadena. Apart from some very wealthy folks who would have to have a lot of free time, it would not work. It somewhat works for hoops, but the arenas, which do not always sell out, are much smaller and the NCAA has teams play in the same site for two games. That works in basketball where you can play twice in three days. Giving some teams home games would be good for attendance, but bad for both the visitors and the current bowl system. If Oregon hosted three to four playoff games they would be a favorite for the national title. Having to win on the road for the month of December would make it nearly impossible for the Ducks to win. And, of course, their getting a home game in round one as the Pac Ten winner while Boise would have to go on the road will get Senator Hatch and his ilk all fired up again.
So for anyone unable to be excited by the rest of this college football season, I say good riddance to you. There are plenty of fans glad to take your tickets.
Monday, November 9, 2009
View From Bennett Avenue
Saturday was a beautiful day for football here in New York City and I made the trip to the Bronx to see Fordham take on Bucknell. The Rams did win the Patriot League contest, 21-7, as QB John Skelton threw for 305y but are stuck in a fifth place tie in the conference. With two winnable games on the schedule, Fordham has a good chance to be 6-5. That is okay I guess, but more was expected from the final season of Skelton, who led Fordham to the conference crown in 2007 and is on the radar of NFL scouts.
There will soon be pressure on the Fordham program to begin dominating their Patriot League rivals as the school has decided to begin awarding scholarships and to start scheduling FBS opponents. With Navy and Army, and possibly Connecticut, on future schedules, the Fordham program needs to become more competitive. As a member of the alumni, I am lukewarm about the prospects. It will be exciting to see Fordham tangle with bigger programs, but only if they will not be embarrassed. There have always been older donors who yearned for the days of playing the best teams in the nation, but that past can never be recovered. Money spent trying and failing to relive ancient days of football glory would be better spent on a basketball program that has fallen on hard times.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Pac 10 Update
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Remember When
Florida State 24 CLEMSON 21: Only adventurous Florida State (2-1) coach Bobby Bowden would go for fake punt on 4th-and-4 on own 21YL, with score knotted at 21-21, 1:31 left. CB LeRoy Butler ran 76y with ball to set up 19y FG for K Richie Andrews with 32 secs left. On play, ball was snapped to FB Dayne Williams, while P Tim Corlew pretended it went to his right and over his head. Williams placed ball between Butler's feet and then joined O-line in blocking formation to right to "protect" Corlew. Tigers fell for fake and went for Corlew, leaving entire left side open for Butler. Clemson returner-CB Donnell Woolford knocked down Butler at 1YL. Bowden later said he remembered play from Jerry Claiborne, and opted for unusual gamble because tie result would have eliminated FSU from national title picture. Tigers (2-1) had knotted game only 1 min earlier on FB Tracy Johnson's 19y run. Special teams were fruitful for Seminoles as CB Deion Sanders returned 3rd Q punt 76y for team's 2nd TD. Clemson's opening score also had been trick play: WR Chip Davis pulled up on apparent E-around run and threw 61y TD to WR Gary Cooper.
Florida State would finish the season with an 11-1 record, good for third nationally behind Notre Dame and Miami. Clemson would go 10-2 that season and finish no. 9 in the nation.
Friday, November 6, 2009
Weekly Picks
Bob's Picks for Nov. 7, 2009: Point Spreads always are based on Danny Sheridan's Wednesday spreads in USA TODAY.
Bob's picks last week Against-the-Spread (ATS): 1-2, Season: 18-19
All 2009 Games
Last Week ATS:
Favorites covered 29 (54.7%), failed to cover 24, 2 Evens, one No Line
Season ATS:
Favorites covered 183 (48.4%), failed to cover 195
Right Concept, Wrong Teams
Don't blame me for my losing Halloween picks of black-and-orange-clad Oregon State and Oklahoma State. I was right with the Halloween concept, just the wrong teams. I would have like to have picked Princeton, which beat Cornell for only the Tigers' second win of the season. Princeton is now 8-0 since World War II on Halloween.
If only coach Lane Kiffin had told "Sundaymorningquarterbacks" about the Tennessee Volunteers' first-ever donning of black jerseys to go with their orange pants. Of course, the jersey change for Halloween night came as a surprise to the team, so it was impossible to have known. If only, I guarantee we'd have jumped on the Vols in their 31-13 win over South Carolina.
Here are my picks for the week of November 7:
Saturday (3:30 p.m. EST): Ohio State (+4) at PENN STATE
Penn State is back home for the first time in three weeks, and the enormous crowd will deck itself all in white for another Beaver Stadium "white-out." Buckeyes quarterback Terrelle Pryor, without a lot of help on offense at least this season, and he'll face the toughest defense he'll see this season. Pick: Penn State -4
Saturday (3:30 p.m. EST): Louisiana State (+8) at ALABAMA
It may be surprising, but LSU's Jordan Jefferson arrives in Tuscaloosa as the higher rated quarterback than Alabama's Greg McElroy, who has recent problems in the red zone. Bama's defense is as good as it comes, however, and the Crimson Tide is on a mission, off a bye week and wanting to turn their recent 2-7 record against the Tigers. The Tide will have to scrap for every point and likely need a turnover to get an extra TD to cover eight points. Pick: Alabama -8
Paul's Picks for November 7
Paul's picks last week ATS: 2-2, Season 20-16
Doing This for a Living?
There are so many ways to come to a conclusion about any given game when factoring in a spread, whether one crunches numbers or goes with a hunch to just name two, that it is funny that we are talking about a bunch of kids here. When I was that age I could rarely be counted on to do anything with consistency. Sophomore year I do remember having my first beer each day at 10AM while watching reruns of Speed Racer. You would have had to have been crazy to gamble hard-earned money on something that I was involved in that year. Or take the 2009 Purdue Boilermakers, who have upset Ohio State and narrowly lost to both Oregon and Notre Dame. In those games they looked at times to be one of the better teams in the country. But they are 3-6 on the year and lost 37-0 last week to a solid-but-not-spectacular Wisconsin team. So when factoring in weather and injury reports and past history and whatever else you use to make your picks, it still comes down to which games a team like Purdue shows up for and which games they do not.
Here are my picks for the week of November 7:
Saturday (Noon EDT): Northwestern (+16.5) at IOWA
While I guess you can make an argument that the Hawkeyes are due for an easy win, this cardiac-inducing squad is more likely to continue to sweat out the victories. There is so much at stake for a team that is too reliant on making plays in the 4th Q that something has to give. Northwestern was playing Penn State even until QB Mike Kafka went down with an injury. He is in the starting lineup Saturday for a Wildcats team that beat Iowa in Iowa City last year and in 2006. Pick: Northwestern +16.5
Saturday (3:30 p.m. EDT): Oregon (-6.5) at STANFORD
Sure Stanford is undefeated at home this year and yes you can make a strong case that Oregon is still playing their whipping of USC over and over again in their minds, but the Ducks are just too strong for a game Cardinal team. Making matters worse for the home team was the knee injury suffered in practice Tuesday by LB Clinton Snyder, the team's leading tackler, who is lost for the season. Pick: Oregon -6.5
Saturday (3:30 p.m. EDT): Duke (+10) at NORTH CAROLINA
Why not ride the Blue Devils, who are 2-0 on the road in the ACC this season? They have such a huge advantage in the QB department between their own Thaddeus Lewis (188-296/2315y, 15 TDs, 4 INTs), who is red hot, and UNC's T.J. Yates (126-211/1159y, 9 TDs, 9 INTs), who lacks consistency, that this spread is out of whack. Pick: Duke +10
Saturday (7:30 p.m. EDT): Houston at TULSA (even)
Houston is doing its best to make a case for a BCS bowl. Is that motivation or pressure? Being that they still have work to do to secure the Conference USA West Division, I opt for the motivation factor. QB Case Keenum should add to his impressive season stats page against a Tulsa defense that allowed SMU frosh QB Kyle Padron to throw for 354y last week. Tulsa has played four weak teams this year (Tulane, New Mexico, San Houston State and Rice) and swept them and four teams with a pulse (Oklahoma, Boise State, UTEP and SMU) and lost all four. Pick: Houston Even
View From Bennett Avenue
That said, the great need for ESPN to evaluate college players during the college season largely in terms of their future draft worth is unsettling. Within minutes of reporting the suspension of Oregon RB LeGarrette Blount earlier this season, the network trotted out of their draft experts, Todd McShay, to tell us that he then considered Blount a second round talent. When Dez Bryant was suspended in mid-season for lying to the NCAA (don't get me started) we found out that he was considered the top WR prospect in the junior class. Sam Bradford? Still a top 10 talent. His teammate Jermaine Gresham, also out for the year with an injury? The top TE.
Who cares? The draft is months away and except for fans of the Browns, Lions, Chiefs, Rams, Buccaneers, etc of the NFL (I will not put the Raiders in this category as fans of the Silver and Black must no longer care about a draft that never seems to help their club), hardly the focus in the fall of a fan of the NFL. I would not mind so much if this discussion of the draft futures of injured and suspended players was part of a large picture of analysis regarding the loss of these players to their teams. But no, they do not discuss the talent and experience of the guy's replacing this unfortunate crew, except for Landry Jones as he is now the Oklahoma QB. There is no discussion of changes to the playbook with these replacement players in the lineup. No analysis of the potential of opposing teams to exploit the absence of the players. Nope. There is no time for that but plenty of time to promote an event airing in five months. And this is despite the fact that these artificial rankings will change myriad times between now and April after huge factors such as the rest of the regular season, bowl games, all-star games, combines and workouts.
While most of this issue is simply annoying there is one aspect of it that is particularly troubling. When ESPN continually mentions that an underclassman is projected to go high in the draft that player may decide to go out even if he is not ready. Or that player may play differently knowing that he has NFL money waiting for him. The more they discuss the draft during the season the tougher it is for programs to keep their kids focused on the game at hand.
There is something else too that sticks in my craw. Discussing a player's worth to the NFL treats his college play as just a set-up to his future pro career. It hammers home the notion that college play is inferior to the pro game. I find that both college football and pro football are great sports. College football has so much going for it that considering it secondary to anything is ridiculous. ESPN, which has been airing college football games for a very long time, should know better.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
College Football Performance Formula
The Big Twelve Conference's Texas Longhorns, who beat Oklahoma State (now with a 6-2 record), leads Florida (8-0), victors Saturday over rival Georgia. The Gators leaped past idle Alabama (8-0), while Iowa (9-0) dropped from fourth to fifth behind TCU (8-0).
The top 15 FBS schools after of November 1:
1. Texas 1.8740
2. Florida 1.7743
3. Alabama 1.7577
4. TCU 1.7324
5. Iowa 1.6909
6. Oregon 1.6841
7. Cincinnati 1.6806
8. Boise State 1.6432
9. Louisiana State 1.6012
10. Pittsburgh 1.5559
11. Penn State 1.5131
12. Ohio State 1.5073
13. Georgia Tech 1.5038
14. Virginia Tech 1.4990
15. Southern California 1.4496
The Performance Formula compiles a grade for each of college football's FBS teams based on three stat categories: winning percentage, opponents' winning percentage, and scoring margin.